AVNEESH JHINGAN
National Highways Authority of India – Appellant
Versus
Modan Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Avneesh Jhingan, J. - The Union of India/National Highways Authority of India(NHAI) and the land owners are before this Court in appeals under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the 1996 Act').
2. The aforementioned appeals are being disposed of by a common order as these arise from one acquisition, involving similar facts and issues.
3. For convenience the facts are being considered from FAO- 756-2022 and cross appeal FAO-2065-2022.
4. The facts shorn off unnecessary details are that notification under Section 3-A of the National Highways Act, 1956 (for short, 'the 1956 Act') was notified on 25.5.2012, proposing to acquire lands of twenty five villages on National Highway No.64 from 50.700 Kms to 209.500 Kms (Patiala-Sangrur-Bathinda stretch). The notification under Section 3-D of the 1956 Act was issued on 3.5.2013. The Competent Authority for Land Acquisition (hereinafter referred to as 'CALA') on 15.1.2014 relying upon the prices fixed by Price Fixation Committee determined the compensation amount.
5. Aggrieved of the decision of CALA, the arbitration was initiated at the instance of land owners. The proceedings culminated in award dated 27.3.2
Kinnari Mullick and Anr. vs. Ghanshyam Das Damani (2018) 11 SCC 328
M/s Som Datt Builders Ltd. vs. State of Kerala
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. SAW Pipes Ltd.
State of Chhattisgarh vs. Sale Udyog Private Ltd.
Tamilnadu Electricity Board vs. M/s Bridge Tunnel Constructions
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.