SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 553

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Subhash – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Abhinav Sood, Advocate, for the Appellant; Ms. Mahima Yashpal, DAG, Haryana., for the State

JUDGMENT

Tribhuvan Dahiya, J. (Oral) - This is a petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.39 dated 22.02.2022, under Sections 67, 67-A of Information Technology Act, 2000, 376(2)(n) & 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Women, NIT, Faridabad, District Faridabad.

2. As per allegations in the FIR lodged by the prosecutrix aged 47 years, she came in contact with the petitioner in December 2016 and the petitioner kept on making physical relations with her till December 2021. He had been threatening the complainant to make her obscene photographs viral, infact, on 01.12.2021, the said photographs were sent to one of her friends on her WhatsApp, that led to lodging of the FIR in question.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the allegations taken on its face value establish that the relations between the petitioner and complainant were consensual and continued over a period of about five years without there being any complaint by her. He further contends that the petitioner is in custody since 26.02.2022 and the complainant as well as her friend already stand examined.

3. Learned State counsel, on instructions from L/I May

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top