SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 581

G. S. SANDHAWALIA, HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Amarjit Kaur – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.Arjun Sheoran, D.A.G., Punjab for the appellants in LPA-462-2021 and for the respondents in CWP-13941 & 22915-2016, CWP-10146-2021 and CWP-17958-2022. Ms.Rashika Bansal, Advocate, for Mr.Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in CWP-22915-2016. Mr.Dinesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in CWP-4251-2021. Mr.Varinder Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in CWP-10146-2021. Mr.Jagdeep Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in CWP-17958-2022. None for the petitioner(s) in CWP-13941-2016., for the Appellant; Mr.Vijay Pal, Advocate, for the respondent-Panjab University in CWP-4251-2021. Mr.Brahmeet Singh, Advocate, for Mr.L.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the respondent in LPA-462-2021., for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

G.S. Sandhawalia, J. - The present judgment shall dispose of 6 cases bearing LPA-462-2021, CWP-13941 & 22915-2016 CWP-4251 & 10146-2021 & CWP-17958-2022.

2. Consideration in the present set of cases is as to whether the State is justified in excluding consideration of a married daughter for appointment on compassionate grounds, as per instructions dated 21.11.2002.

3. In LPA-462-2021, the learned Single Judge has allowed CWP-2218-2017 titled Amarjit Kaur Vs. State of Punjab & another on 17.01.2020 and declared Clause (c) of Note-I of the policy/instructions dated 21.11.2002 as ultra vires of Articles 14 & 15 of the Constitution of India and struck off of the said policy and instructions. Directions have been issued that it would read as 'Daughter (including adopted Daughter)' whereas earlier it would read as 'Un-married Daughter (including adopted Daughter)' which was the definition of the dependent family members. Learned Single Judge has further also recorded a finding that the petitioner therein was residing in her mother's house at Village Baghel Singh Wala as per the verification report of the DSP, CID, Tarn Taran who remained dependent upon the pensionary benefits of th

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                whatsapp-icon Back to top