SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 522

MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Gajna – Appellant
Versus
Bittu – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Suman Jain, Advocate, for the Appellant; ;

JUDGMENT

Meenakshi I. Mehta, J. - By way of the instant revision petition, the petitioners-plaintiffs (here-in-after to be referred as 'the plaintiffs') have laid challenge to the judgment dated 31.10.2022 (Annexure P-10) handed down by learned Additional District Judge, Palwal (for short 'the Appellate Court'), whereby the appeal preferred by respondents No.1 to 6-defendants (here-in-after to be referred as 'the defendants') to assail the order dated 03.10.2022 (Annexure P-8) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hodal (for short 'the trial Court'), in Civil Suit No.670 of 2022 titled as 'Gajna and Others vs. Bittu and Others', has been allowed and the application moved by them (plaintiffs) under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC, has been dismissed.

2. As per the brief factual-matrix leading to the filing of the present revision petition, the plaintiffs have filed the said Civil Suit against the defendants and proforma respondent No.7 for seeking a decree for the declaration to the effect that they (plaintiffs) are the owners in possession of the suit land and they have further prayed for the relief of permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from int

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top