VIKAS BAHL
Ajay – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral) - Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that Section 201 IPC has been added later on in the FIR and thus, has orally prayed that the said Section 201 IPC be read into the head note as well as prayer clause of the present petition.
2. In view of the oral prayer made, Section 201 IPC be added in the head note as well as in the prayer clause of the present petition and the Registry is directed to carry out the necessary correction.
3. This is a first petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR no.806 dated 24.12.2021 registered under Sections 379, 420 IPC (Sections 120B and 201 IPC added later on) at Police Station Azad Nagar, Hisar, District Hisar accordingly.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and as per the FIR, there was only one person who had come to the complainant and had taken his ATM card and had explained to him how to use the same. It is further submitted that even as per the prosecution case, the said person was not the petitioner. It is stated that during the course of the investigation, the relevant CCTV footage near the SBI ATM
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.