MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Ashish Hora – Appellant
Versus
Chirag Hora – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manjari Nehru Kaul, J. (Oral). - The petitioners are impugning the dismissal of their application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'the Code') by the Court below vide order dated 19.02.2020 (Annexure P-1).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the impugned order is patently illegal and contrary to the settled principles of law pertaining to the rejection of a plaint. He submits that the Trial Court failed to appreciate that the plaintiffs had challenged mutations bearing No. 10868 and 10869 in the suit in question, even though the jurisdiction of Civil Court to set aside the entries of mutation sanctioned by the revenue authorities is barred under Section 158 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Learned counsel submits that the only remedy as prescribed under the Act was to challenge mutations by way of preferring an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner. He further submits that the suit had been filed much beyond the period of limitation and the plaint was liable to be rejected on this ground as well.
3. I have heard learned counsel and perused the relevant material on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.