SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1683

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Tarsem Chand – Appellant
Versus
Manjit Kaur Vashisht – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Aminder Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) - The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant-complainant aggrieved of the judgment dated 10.10.2017 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sangrur, in Complaint No.156 dated 01.04.2016 titled Tarsem Chand Vs. Manjit Kaur Vashisht.

2. Briefly summarized the facts of the case are as under:-

    1. The complaint was registered on the allegations by the complainant that the accused has borrowed a sum of Rs.1,55,000/- from the complainant in cash in the month of July 2015 as the accused was in dire need of money. The accused to discharge her legal liability, issued cheque No.138377 dated 10.2.2016 for Rs.1,55,000/- drawn on Axix Bank, branch Sangrur, from her account no.915010021867503 to the complainant. On presentation of the said cheque for encashment, the same was dishonoured and returned with the remarks 'Fund Insufficient' vide memo dated 11.02.2016. Thereafter, the complainant issued a legal notice dated 15.02.2016 , but the accused failed to clear the account of the complainant.

    2. After going through the complaint and affidavit on record, produced by the complainant, the accused was ordered to be summoned to face trial under Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top