PANKAJ JAIN
Anshuman Vashishata – Appellant
Versus
Bhuvnesh Mahajan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Pankaj Jain, J. (Oral) - By this common order, I intend to dispose off two petitions filed seeking quashing of complaint No.450 of 2021 dated 14.09.2021 (Annexure P-2) titled 'Bhuvnesh Mahajan Vs. Sushant Kohli & ors.' under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'NIA') read with Sections 420, 406, 409, 120-B, 34 & 201 IPC and summoning order dated 17.10.2022 (Annexure P-1).
2. Respondent filed aforesaid complaint against the petitioners in the present two petitions and one Sushant Kohli, wherein he claimed that :-
3) That, in month of June 2019, Complainant gave an amount of RS. 250000/- as per demand of Accused for making a fixed FDR in some repudiated bank, as Accused was in dire need of same because Accused told to Complainant that job of Accused is in danger and Accused directed by his senior Officers to get a big amount of cash for making a fixed FDR under agency code of Accused, otherwise Accused shall be fired from his some private job. It is further submitted that the Accused No. 2 alongwith Accused No. 3 visited the premises of Complainant and received the cash amount of Rs. 250000/- for registering the policy (Insurance Policy) in the presen
M/s Pepsi Foods Ltd. & Anr. vs. Special Judicial Magistrate & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.