SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2232

DINESH PATHAK
Riyazuddin – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Raj Kumar Tiwari, Lok Nath Shukla.
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Pathak, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The present applicant has invoked the inherent power of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the impugned summoning order dated 14.6.2022 as well as entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.21921 of 2011 ( Museer Ali alias Museer Miyan v. Riyazuddin ), under Section 138 of Negotiable of Instrument Act(in brevity "N.I. Act."), pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Firozabad.

3. Opposite party No.2 has moved a complaint dated 02.11.2021 under section 138 of N.I. Act with an allegation that he has given Rs. 5,00,000/- and 2,00,000/- total 7,00,000/- to the accused (applicant) and in lieu thereof he has furnished two cheques i.e. bearing No.551540, amounting Rs. 5,00,000/- dated 15.09.2021 and cheque No. 551541 dated 21.09.2021 amounting Rs. 2,00,000/-. However on the presentation of the aforesaid cheques to the bank same was dishonored for want of sufficient funds. After considering the statement of the complainant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. and the contents of the complaint, learned trial court has found, prima facie, case under Section 138 N.I. Act, according

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top