SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1919

HARKESH MANUJA
Karamjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jagmail Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.V.K. Shukla, Advocate for the Appellant; Mr. Akhil Kashyap, Advocate for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Harkesh Manuja, J. - By way of present revision petition challenge has been made to an order dated 23.10.2018 (P-1) passed by the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Moga; whereby prayer made on behalf of petitioners/ defendants (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioners') for seeking permission to lead secondary evidence in order to prove registered Will dated 29.12.1988, purportedly executed in their favour, has been declined.

2. Facts leading to the present case revision petition that the respondents/ plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondents') filed a suit for declaration claiming the estate left by deceased Babu Singh, based on a Will dated 24.01.1989.

3. Upon notice, petitioners appeared and set up a registered Will dated 29.12.1988 executed by Babu Singh in their favour. During trial, the petitioners moved an application under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, seeking permission to prove the Will dated 29.12.1988 by way of secondary evidence. The said application was contested by the respondents by way of filing their objections to it.

4. Vide impugned order dated 23.10.2018, the trial Court declined the prayer made by the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top