Karan vs State of Haryana - 2022 Supreme(P&H) 1781

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1781

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, PANKAJ JAIN
Karan – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. A.P.S. Deol, Senior Advocate Assisted By Mr. Vishal Rattan Lamba, Advocate Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, Advocate, Ms. Sanya Kaushal, Advocate and Mr. Aditya Singla, Advocate, Mr. S.S. Narula, Advocate, Mr. R.S. Cheema, Senior Advocate Assisted By Mr. Arshdeep S. Cheema, Advocate and Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Preetinder S. Ahluwalia, Advocate and Mr. Randhir Singh, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, for the Respondent.

Table of Content
1. background of the case with victim's allegations (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments against conviction based on alleged discrepancies (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court's focus on consent in relation to ipc sections (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT

Pankaj Jain, J. - These three appeals and the revision are directed against the judgment arising out of FIR No. 144 dated 11th April, 2015 registered under Sections 376 D, 376(2)(n), 376, 292, 120-B, 506 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 and Section 67 of the I.T. Act, at Police Station Rai Sonepat.

2. Details of conviction and sentence awarded to the appellants are tabulated hereunder :-

Name of the convict

Offender u/s

Period of sentence (RI)

Fine Imposed

Period of sentence in default of payment of fine (RI)

Hardik

376(D) IPC

376(2)(n) IPC

120-B IPC

292 r/w 34 IPC

506 IPC

67-A of Information Technology Act, 2000

Twenty years

Ten years

Seven years

Two years

Five years

Rs.20,000/-

Rs.10,000/-

Rs.2,000/-

Rs.50,000/-

One year

Ten months

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1781

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, PANKAJ JAINKaran – AppellantVersusState of Haryana – Respondent

Cases Referred (29)

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, PANKAJ JAIN
Karan – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent