SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 623

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J.
Tajinder Kaur - Petitioner - Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab and others - Respondents - Respondent
CWP-14214 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 07-07-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ashok Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Paramjit Batta, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

The legal heir certificate circular was not applicable for retiral benefits if the claimant was not mentioned in the service record, and a competent declaration from a civil court was required for such claims.

Headnote:

Legal Heir Certificate - Application of Circular for Legal Heir Certificate - The court held that the circular for issuing legal heir certificate was solely for considering claims for compassionate appointment, and not for the retiral benefits of an employee who has not mentioned the claimant in the service record during his lifetime. The court directed the petitioner to obtain a competent declaration from a civil court before applying for the retiral benefits.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a legal heir aid certificate, claiming entitlement as per a state-issued circular. The Deputy Director concluded that the certificate cannot be issued as the deceased did not mention the petitioner as his wife in his service record.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the application of the circular for issuing the legal heir certificate to be misconceived and dismissed the petition, directing the petitioner to obtain a competent declaration from a civil court before applying for the retiral benefits.

Issues: Application of circular for legal heir certificate, entitlement to retiral benefits without mention in service record, requirement of competent declaration from civil court.

Ratio Decidendi: The circular for legal heir certificate was intended for compassionate appointment claims, not for retiral benefits of an employee who did not mention the claimant in the service record. The petitioner was directed to obtain a competent declaration from a civil court before applying for the retiral benefits.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed as misconceived, and the petitioner was directed to obtain a competent declaration from a civil court before applying for the retiral benefits.

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.

1. By way of present Writ Petition, petitioner prays to direct the respondents to issue legal heir aid certificate to the petitioner as claimed her in application dated 02.06.2022 (P-3).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the State of Punjab issued instructions from 19.09.2002 (P-10) directing the Heads of the Departments and Commissioner of Divisions to issue legal heir certificates.

3. I have considered the submissions.

4. Earlier this Court passed an order to the respondents to examine the claim of the petitioner and the Deputy Director has reached to the conclusion that the said legal heir certificate in terms of the orders passed by the Court cannot be issued as the deceased has nowhere mentioned in his entire service record of the petitioner being his wife.

5. In the said circumstances, the applicability of the circular dated 19.09.2002 for issuing of legal heir certificate is found to be misconceived. The said circular is solely for the purpose of considering respective claims of persons for compassionate appointment, and in that respect the department is empowered.

6. However, claim of any person for the retiral benefits of an employee who has not mentioned of the relation or named him in the service record during his lifetime, can be settled only after a competent Civil Court gives a declaration in his or her favour. Procedure for obtaining succession certificate in this regard has been laid down under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 as well as Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

7. The petitioner would have to get the said competent declaration from the competent court granting her liberty to apply for the same.

8. Petition is misconceived and dismissed accordingly.

Petition dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top