IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Vikas Bahl, J.
Raj Kumari - Petitioner - Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab and others - Respondents - Respondent
CWP-2842 of 2023
Decided On : 13-02-2023
Punjab Panchayati Raj Act - Illegal Possession of Public Street - The court directed respondent No.2 to look into the legal notice and take necessary action in accordance with law after making necessary enquiry.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a Civil Writ Petition seeking a writ of mandamus to direct respondent Nos.1 to 4 to take action against respondents 6 to 8 for illegal possession of land comprised in a public street.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed respondent No.2 to look into the legal notice and take necessary action in accordance with law after making necessary enquiry.
Issues: The issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to seek the suspension and removal of the Sarpanch or Panch under Section 20 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the power of suspension and removal under Section 20 is an enabling power and does not give the petitioner the right to seek suspension and removal. However, the Director Panchayat was directed to look into the legal notice and take necessary action in accordance with law after making necessary enquiry.
Final Decision: The Civil Writ Petition was disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the legal notice and take necessary action in accordance with law after making necessary enquiry.
VIKAS BAHL, J.
1. This is a Civil Writ Petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent Nos.1 to 4 to take necessary action as per law against respondent Nos.6 to 8 who have been found to be in illegal possession of land comprised in khasra No.20, which is a public street, on the basis of demarcation report dated 06.05.2022 (Annexure P-3) submitted by respondent No.4.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a detailed legal notice dated 29.05.2022 (Annexure P-4) has been given by the petitioner to the various respondents including respondent No.2-Director, Panchayat, giving the details of the allegations including the fact that private respondents are in illegal possession of shareaam raasta and has submitted that as per provision of Section 20 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (hereinafter to be referred as “the Act of 1994”), the Director has the power to suspend or remove the Sarpanch or Panch, in case, an act done by the said Panch or Sarpanch falls within the grounds mentioned under Section 20(1) of the Act of 1994. It is further submitted that one of the grounds constitutes violation of Section 208 of the Act of 1994 and as per Section 208(1)(k) of the Act of 1994, an unauthorised occupation of property belonging to any local authority is a ground for disqualification of the Member of Panchayat. It is contended that the petitioner would be satisfied in case, the present Civil Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into representation/legal notice dated 29.05.2022 (Annexure P-4) and after considering the same, to take action, in accordance with law, after following due procedure.
3. Learned State counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 has submitted that the power of suspension and removal under Section 20 is an enabling power and same would not give a right to the petitioner to seek the suspension and removal of the Sarpanch or Panch. However, since the power is vested with the Director to order an enquiry, thus, the Director Panchayat-respondent No.2 would look into the representation/legal notice dated 29.05.2022 (Annexure P-4), in accordance with law and in case respondent No.2 is of the opinion that any action is required to be taken with respect to the same, then the same would be taken, in accordance with law after following the principles of natural justice.
4. Keeping in view the above said facts and circumstances, the present Civil Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation/legal notice dated 29.05.2022 (Annexure P-4) and in case, after looking into the said legal notice and making necessary enquiry, respondent No.2 is of the opinion that any action is required to be taken in the matter, then the same be done, in accordance with law and after giving due opportunity of hearing to respondent Nos.6 to 8.
Order accordingly.
The court emphasized the enabling nature of the power of suspension and removal under Section 20 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act and directed respondent No.2 to take necessary action in accordance w....
The court emphasized the enabling power of suspension and removal under Section 20 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, and the requirement to follow principles of natural justice in taking necess....
The court emphasized the enabling power of suspension and removal under Section 20 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, vested with the Director, and the requirement to follow the principles of na....
The writ court should refrain from adjudicating on the correctness of demarcation reports when the matter is pending before the Director, and the appellant has alternative remedies available under th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.