SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2889

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL, J.
Sukhdev Singh – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CWP NO. 20420 of 2022
Decided On : 24-05-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. R.S. Athwal, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Karan Puggal, DAG, Punjab for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate for Respondent No.4.

Headnote:(A) Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 20(4) and 208 - Judicial review of administrative orders - Suspension of Sarpanch challenged due to alleged connivance in illegal occupation - Court upheld reinstatement after determining lack of evidence for misconduct. (Paras 7, 8, 9, and 10)

(B) Principle of democratic representation - Lengthy suspension not in the interest of Panchayati Raj democracy as discussed in previous judgments. (Paras 7(1))

Facts of the case:
Petitioner challenged reinstatement of Sarpanch alleging misconduct for failing to evict illegal occupants despite previous orders. The Director had suspended Sarpanch citing his collusion with illegal occupants.

Findings of Court:
The Court upheld the reinstatement order, establishing that the Sarpanch had made efforts to evict encroachers and that there was no merit in the allegations against him. The suspension was deemed not justified under the Act.

Issues: The main issues addressed the validity of the reinstatement order and whether the grounds for suspension were substantiated.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that suspension under Section 20(4) requires grounds that could merit removal under Section 20 and established that actions attributed to connivance were unfounded.

Result: Petition dismissed; reinstatement of Sarpanch upheld.

Table of Content
1. reinstatement of sarpanch after suspension. (Para 1 , 2)
2. failure to act against encroachments. (Para 3)
3. defense of actions taken by sarpanch. (Para 4 , 5)
4. legality of suspension and reinstatement. (Para 6)
5. judicial observations on the case. (Para 7 , 8)
6. independence of inquiry from this decision. (Para 9)
7. dismissal of the civil writ petition. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Mr. Vikas Bahl, J.

Challenge in the present Civil Writ Petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 29.07.2022 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Additional Chief Secretary, Punjab Government, Department of Rural Development and Panchayats (Exercising the powers of Government under the PUNJAB PANCHAYATI RAJ ACT , 1994) vide which the order dated 07.12.2021 has been set aside and respondent No.4 has been reinstated as Sarpanch of Village Kohala, Tehsil and District Jalandhar. Further prayer has been made that the order dated 07.12.2021 passed by the Director, Department of Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab (Annexure P-3) vide which respondent No.4 had been suspended from the post of Sarpanch, be upheld.

Brief Facts Of The Case:-

2. Brief facts of the present case are that respondent No.4-Jassa Singh was elected as Sarpanch of Village Kohala in January, 2019. The Director, Rural Development and Panchayats, vide its order dated 07.12.2021 (Annexure P-3), had suspended respondent No.4 from the post of Sarpanch while exercising its powers under Section 20 (4) of the PUNJAB PANCHAYATI RAJ ACT , 1994 (hereinafter to be referred as "the 1994 Act") on the ground that respondent No.4 had not initiated action for vacating the illegal occupation of the occupants from the panchayat land and had colluded with them. Respondent No.4 had filed an appeal before the Additional Chief Secretary, Punjab Government and the said appeal was allowed vide order dated 29.07.2022 (Annexure P-4) and respondent No.4 was reinstated to the post of Sarpanch. In the said order, it was stated that the observations made in the order would have no bearing on the merits of the regular inquiry which is pending. The petitioner, who is stated to be a resident of Village Kohala, has filed the present writ petition challenging the order dated 29.07.2022 (Annexure P-4) reinstating respondent No.4 as Sarpanch.

Arguments On Behalf Of The Petitioner:-

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the earlier Gram Panchayat had instituted an application under Section 7 of the PUNJAB VILLAGE COMMON LANDS ACT read with Sections 5 and 7 of the PUBLIC PREMISES ACT , 1971 for evicting Satnam Kaur wife of Bikkar Singh, Bikkar Singh son of Ujagar Singh, Gurmeet Singh son of Bikkar Singh and Tara Singh son of Dhir Singh from Khewat No.337, Khatauni No.517, Khasra No.83(4-10) situated in Village Kohala, District Jalandhar. It is further submitted that vide order dated 21.03.2018 (Annexure P-1), the DDPO-cum-Collector, Jalandhar had allowed the said application and the said persons were ordered to be ejected from the land in dispute and were directed to remove the illegal encroachment and were imposed a penalty/fine of Rs.50,000/-. It is contended that respondent No.4 who was elected as a Sarpanch in January 2019, did not take any active steps to evict the persons named above, against whom, the eviction order dated 21.03.2018 had been passed. It is further contended that it is the petitioner who had filed writ petition bearing No.CWP- 10879-2019 and in the said case, the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.09.2021, had directed that demarcation be carried out by Total Survey Machine on or before 29.09.2021 and the matter was adjourned to 06.10.2021 with a direction that demarcation report be submitted before the Court and it was further observed that in case, any of the parties were found to be in illegal possession of land then the said party would hand over the vacant possession of the land to the Gram Panchayat. It is subm

                                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                  1
                                  2
                                  3
                                  4
                                  5
                                  6
                                  7
                                  8
                                  9
                                  10
                                  11
                                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                  supreme today icon
                                  logo-black

                                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                  Please visit our Training & Support
                                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                  qr

                                  Scan Me!

                                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                  whatsapp-icon Back to top