SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1260

SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Daljit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Hardeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Monika Jalota, Sr. DAG, Punjab

SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

1. The grievance(s) raised in the instant writ petition, is that, there are encroachments made on several tracts of land, which are owned by the Panchayat Deh concerned. The said encroachments are contended to be made at the instance of the encroachers concerned.

2. One of the encroachers, upon the Panchayat Deh land, is averred to be co-respondent No.7, who is also the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Village Boharpur, Block Sanour, Tehsil and District Patiala.

3. The learned State counsel, on instructions given to her, by Mr. Lakhwinder Singh, Panchayat Secretary, BDPO Sanour submits, that the above Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat concerned, has after completion, of demarcation proceedings in respect of certain tracts of land, owned by the Panchayat Deh concerned, and, whereons encroachments became detected, hence instituted a petition under Section 7 of The Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) before the learned Collector concerned. The above statement, at the bar by the learned State counsel, becomes the base of the grievance reared, by the petitioner herein, inasmuch as, he submits that one of the encroachers, upo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top