JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Jogindro – Appellant
Versus
Oriental Bank of Commerce – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J.
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 18.03.2016 (Annexure P-6) whereby application of the petitioner seeking compassionate appointment has been declined.
2. The husband of the petitioner was working with respondent-Oriental Bank of Commerce as Head Peon. He passed away on 25.12.2014 in harness. He was survived by his wife-petitioner and two children. The petitioner vide application dated 20.04.2015 (Annexure P-2) requested the respondent-bank to extend benefit of ex gratia scheme. The respondent-bank put up the matter before the higher authorities. The General Manager (HRD) vide communication dated 10.03.2016 (Annexure P-5) intimated Regional Office that petitioner is not entitled to compassionate appointment, however, she may be released a sum of Rs.6 Lacs as ex gratia amount subject to furnishing of documents jotted down in the said letter. Letter dated 10.03.2016 is reproduced as below:-
This has reference to the application to the application of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.