IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jagmohan Bansal, J.
Smt. Jogindro - Petitioner
Versus
Oriental Bank of Commerce and others – Respondents
CWP-8306-2018
Decided On : 01-02-2024
COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT - Employment Benefits - [Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India] - [Circular No.HRD/64/35/2007/290 dated 26.09.2007, Recovery and Law Deptt. Circular No.HO/Recovery&Law/14/2006-07/602 dated 26.03.2007, HO/REC & Law Circular No.02/2015-16/40 dated 01.04.2015] - The court held that the petitioner is entitled to ex gratia amount of Rs.6 Lacs as sanctioned by respondent-bank along with interest @ 6% per annum, based on the beneficial legislation and the goal set out by the Constitution.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought setting aside of the order declining her application for compassionate appointment after her husband's death. The respondent-bank had offered ex gratia amount in lieu of appointment on compassionate grounds, which the petitioner initially declined.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner is entitled to the ex gratia amount as sanctioned by the respondent-bank, along with interest at 6% per annum, based on the beneficial legislation and the goal set out by the Constitution.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to compassionate appointment or ex gratia amount in lieu of appointment on compassionate grounds.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner is entitled to the ex gratia amount as sanctioned by the respondent-bank, based on the beneficial legislation and the goal set out by the Constitution.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondent-bank to release a sum of Rs.6 Lacs along with interest @ 6% from 01.04.2016 till the date of payment to the petitioner.
JUDGMENT :
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J.
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 18.03.2016 (Annexure P-6) whereby application of the petitioner seeking compassionate appointment has been declined.
2. The husband of the petitioner was working with respondent-Oriental Bank of Commerce as Head Peon. He passed away on 25.12.2014 in harness. He was survived by his wife-petitioner and two children. The petitioner vide application dated 20.04.2015 (Annexure P-2) requested the respondent-bank to extend benefit of ex gratia scheme. The respondent-bank put up the matter before the higher authorities. The General Manager (HRD) vide communication dated 10.03.2016 (Annexure P-5) intimated Regional Office that petitioner is not entitled to compassionate appointment, however, she may be released a sum of Rs.6 Lacs as ex gratia amount subject to furnishing of documents jotted down in the said letter. Letter dated 10.03.2016 is reproduced as below:-
This has reference to the application to the application of Sh. Shiv Kumar S/o late Sh. Satpal, Ex- Head Peon. B/O G.T. Karnal for appointment in the bank on compassionate grounds. In this connection, we regret to inform that the request of the subject for appointment on compassionate grounds has been considered but not acceded to by the competent authority as per provision of the scheme.
But as per scheme for payment of Ex-gratia amount in lieu of appointment on compassionate grounds family of family of the deceased is eligible for EX Gratia Amount. You are advised to make the payment of Ex Gratia amount of Rs 6,00 000.00 (Six Lacs only ) to the legal heirs of the deceased to the debit of Charges General (Estt) through B/O G.T. Karnal after obtaining the affidavit, letter of authority subject to fulfillment of the following conditions:
1. Ensure to confirm the authenticity of the claimant being the lawful legal heir of the deceased and he/she falls under the definition of “Family” as circulated vide our Circular No.HRD/64/35/2007/290 dated 26.09.2007. All papers/documents as required in case of settlement of claims of deceased depositor as circulated vide Recovery and Law Deptt. Circular No.HO/Recovery&Law/14/2006-07/602 dated 26.03.2007, HO/REC & Law Circular No.02/2015-16/40 dated 01.04.2015 are to be obtained from the claimants in proof of their being the legal heir of the deceased kept on record.
2. Before release of payment of ex-gratia, it should be ensured that no dues/loans exist against the name of the deceased. All the outstanding dues/loans against the name of the deceased are to be recovered from the amount of ex-gratia payable.
3. Receipt for payment of ex-gratia amount in lieu of appointment on compassionate grounds as per performa enclosed is obtained and kept on record.
Further, you are requested to inform us the action taken in the matter and a copy of the receipt for payment of ex-gratia amount in lieu of appointment on compassionate grounds is sent to us for our record.”
3. The respondent-bank vide communication dated 18.03.2016 (Annexure P-6) intimated son of the petitioner that his application for compassionate appointment has been declined, however, as per scheme for payment of ex gratia amount in lieu of appointment on compassionate grounds, family is eligible for ex gratia amount of Rs. 6 Lacs. Letter dated 18.03.2016 is reproduced as below:-
In reference to your application for appointment in the Bank on compassionate grounds we regret to inform that your request has been considered but not acceded to by the competent authority as per provisions of scheme, but as per scheme for payment of Ex-gratia amount in lieu of appointment on compassionate grounds family of the deceased (Sh. Satpal) is eligible for Ex Gratia amount
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner is entitled to the ex gratia amount as sanctioned by the respondent-bank, based on the beneficial legislation and the goal set ....
The court ruled that the absence of documentation from the bank invalidated its rejection of the petitioner's claim for ex-gratia payment, mandating reconsideration under the applicable compassionate....
The main legal point established is that the eligibility criteria for compassionate appointment is governed by specific provisions in the Circular dated 03.08.2015 and cannot be extended to include g....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the eligibility criteria for compassionate appointment is only as per Para 5.1 and 5.2 of the Circular dated 03.08.2015, and not as stipulated....
Compassionate appointment claims depend on the family's financial condition; income over the threshold can justify rejection.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.