SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 2249

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Gurvinder Singh Gill, J.
Pranjil Batra – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
CRM-M No. 23705 of 2022
Decided On : 04-11-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties :Mr. Vikram Chaudhri Senior, Advocate, Mr. Sajal Bansal, Ms. Hargun Sandhu, Mr. Kunal Sharma, Mr. Satya Pal Jain ASG, Mr. Shobit Phutela

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 4 and Section 45 - The petitioner sought regular bail after being arrested and charged under the PMLA following evidence of involvement in a Ponzi scheme, initially cited as a witness - The case centers around the gravity of medical issues faced by the petitioner and the stringent conditions under which bail is granted under PMLA. (Paras 1, 4, 20, 22)

(B) Bail - Conditions for granting bail under the PMLA were scrutinized, especially the requirement for a public prosecutor's opportunity to oppose and the need for reasonable grounds to believe in the accused's innocence. The court noted that the petitioner met the 'sick' exception due to serious health conditions. (Paras 12, 14, 21)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was implicated through evolving investigation from being cited as a witness to being charged as an accused in a financial scam that defrauded many individuals, with substantial money flows associated with his accounts.

Findings of Court:
The court granted bail to the petitioner considering his severe medical condition, despite the serious charges against him, emphasizing that the fate of the main case is not affected.

Issues: The main issues included the interpretation of the health-related exception to bail under Section 45 and whether the evidence of complicity warranted denial of bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that while the evidence suggested complicity, the petitioner's deteriorating health conditions qualified him for bail under the 'sick' exception in the PMLA.

Result: Petition granted; the petitioner is to be released on bail.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's background and arrest (Para 1 , 2 , 7)
2. arguments for bail based on health concerns (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. evidence of complicity and financial transactions (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 17)
4. legal analysis on section 45 of pmla (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. health issues qualify for bail exception (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. final decision granting bail (Para 22 , 23)

Judgment

Mr. Gurvinder Singh Gill, J.

The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in respect of a complaint bearing no. COMA-2-2021 dated 22.1.2021 under Section 4 read with Section 70 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (in short hereinafter referred to as ‘the PMLA’).

2. Since the petitioner was neither initially arrayed as an accused in the complaint nor when some FIRs were registered in Haryana and Hyderabad pursuant to which some ECIRs came to be registered by Enforcement Directorate, the sequence leading to arraying of the petitioner as an accused needs to be referred to, which is briefly stated herein-under:

8.9.2018 : FIR No. 358/2018 dated 8.9.2018 was registered at Police Station Sadar Fatehabad, District Fatehabad, Haryana for offences under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 against Radhey Shyam and Bansi Lal, Directors of M/s FMLC & others.

9.9.2018 : FIR No. 859/2018 dated 9.9.2018 was registered at Police Station, Hisar, Haryana under Sections 420, 406 and 506 IPC, against Radhey Shyam and Bansi Lal, Directors of M/s FMLC & others.

31.8.2019 : Pursuant to constitution of S.I.T., the matters were investigated by S.I.T. and charge-sheet no.2 dated 31.8.2019 was presented in FIR no. 859 and charge-sheet no. 4 dated 20.11.2019 in FIR no. 358 was presented.

9.10.2019 : During the course of investigation of the aforesaid cases, it had transpired that the accused involved in the said cases were also involved in some other FIRs lodged in the State of Telangana i.e. FIR No. 710/2018 dated 30.8.2018, Police Station Kukkatpally, Telangana, FIR No. 643/2018 dated 15.10.2018, Police Station Ramchandrapuram, Cyberbad, Telangana, FIR No. 541/2018 dated 4.9.2018 at Police Station Chandanagar, Telangana and FIR No. 768/2018 dated 14.9.2018, Police Station Mailardedpally, Telangana. The Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad, on the basis of FIR dated 30.08.2018, registered ECIR No.10/HYZO dated 20.03.2019 against Radhey Shyam, Bansi Lal, M/s FMLC & M/s Global Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Subsequently, the Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad, on account of FIRs registered by Haryana Police and on the basis of the residential address and office address of the companies, transferred the investigation to the Chandigarh Zonal Office. The ECIR was renumbered as ECIR/03/CDZO-II/2019 dated 09.10.2019. Later, the Chandigarh Zonal Office, Directorate of Enforcement took cognizance of scheduled offences and initiated investigation by recording ECIR/CDZO-II/02/2021, dated 11.01.2021 at Chandigarh.

22.1.2021 : The Enforcement Directorate filed complaint dated 22.1.2021 (Annexure P-1) before Special Court, Panchkula against Radhey Shyam, Bansi Lal and others wherein the petitioner was cited as a witness at Sr. No. 23 in the list of witnesses. It may here be mentioned that even in FIR No. 358 and FIR No. 859 registered in 2018, the petitioner had been associated as a witness only.

10.3.2022 : Petitioner found to be involved and arrested : Statement of petitioner was recorded on various occasions by the respondent/ED and thereafter upon finding his direct involvement and that he is a beneficiary of crores of rupees, arrested the petitioner on 10.03.2022 after recording his statement and produced before the court on 11.03.2022 and since then he is in custody and at present confined in jail at Ambala, Haryana.

7.5.2022 : Supplementary challan filed and petitioner arrayed as an accused : While the petitioner initially had been cited just as a witness at the time of presentation of complaint against co-accused Radhe Shyam, Bansi Lal an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top