SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1397

ALKA SARIN
Bachan Kaur @ Manjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Kuldip Kaur @ Marina Jayne Squires – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Mr. Saurabh Arora

Table of Content
1. challenge to petition order (Para 1 , 2)
2. counsel arguments on document relevance (Para 3 , 4 , 8)
3. factual background of plaintiff and defendant (Para 6 , 7)
4. overview of order 11 rule 14 cpc (Para 9 , 10)
5. court's analysis of necessity and relevance (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
6. final conclusion and directive (Para 14)

Judgment

Mrs. Alka Sarin, J.

The challenge in the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to the impugned order dated 26.10.2021 vide which the application filed by defendant No.1-petitioner under Order 11 Rule 14 CPC for production of the documents has been disposed off.

2. The grievance of the defendant No.1-petitioner in the present case is that there are certain documents at Sr. Nos.2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 in possession of the plaintiff-respondent No.1 and that she has refused to produce the same.

3. Learned counsel for defendant No.1-petitioner has relied upon Union of India Vs. M/s Kanhiya Dhaliwal Developers & Others in CR No.3868 of 2015 decided on 18.12.2015, Onkar Singh Vs. Ravinder Malhotra , 2013 (36) RCR (Civil) 684, Desa Singh through LRs Vs. Sukhraj Kaur & Ors. 2019 (2) PLR 715, Sharvan Kumar Vs. Sumeet Kumar G

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top