SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1427

H. S. MADAAN
Chand Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jaswant Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties :Mr. M.L. Sarin Senior, Advocate, Ms. Hemani Sarin, Mr. Aayush Arora, Mr. Sanjiv Manrai Senior, Advocate

Judgment

Mr. H.S. Madaan, J.

Shortly put, facts of the case are that plaintiff Chanan Singh son of Lal Singh, resident of village Machaki Mal Singh, Tehsil & District Faridkot had filed a suit for possession of land measuring 158 kanals 14 marlas situated in the revenue estate of village Machaki Mal Singh against defendants Chand Singh, Kulwant Singh, Jabarjang Singh, residents of village Kameana.

2. As per the version of the plaintiff, he and his real brother Hakam Singh constituted a joint Hindu family and they owned 331 kanals 11 marlas of land, which had nature of ancestral and joint Hindu family property; the suit land was in the possession of Hakam Singh as per his share; Hakam Singh died issueless and as a widower, as such the plaintiff succeeded him by way of survivorship.

3. Inter alia, the plaintiff alleged that Hakam Singh was physically and mentally weak having poor understanding; he was an illiterate and a rustic villager and he had suffered attack of paralysis about 6-7 years prior to his death. It was further pleaded that Surjit Singh and his wife Gurdeep Kaur are shrewd and resourceful persons, as such Surjit Singh started cultivating the land of Hakam Singh 6-7 years

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top