Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Foreign Nationals Entitled to Article 22(1) Grounds of Arrest in Known Language: Karnataka HC Sets at Liberty but Orders Handover to FRRO
11 Mar 2026
Madras HC Permits CBSE Student to Appear for Maths as Additional Subject Despite Policy Violation in Peculiar 'Rat Race' Circumstances
11 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Neha Rathore
11 Mar 2026
Menaka Guruswamy Elected India's First Openly Queer Rajya Sabha MP
11 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
T-Series (also known as Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited), New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Dreamline Reality Movies (M/s. ), Mohali – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
Judgment
Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, J.
The present appeal has been filed by the defendants in the original suit challenging the order dated 23.11.2023 passed by the Additional District Judge, Ludhiana whereby the interim application filed by respondent No.l-plaintiff was allowed while restraining the appellants-defendants from producing, telecasting, selling or releasing the movie under the name of “Dear Jassi” or with any other name till final decision of the case.
2. The facts, as involved in the present case are that the appellants intended to produce a film namely, “Dear Jassi” on the story of one Jaswinder Kaur Sidhu @ Jassi. For the said purpose the appellants came across a book written by Mr. Fabian Dawson of Canada. As per the case of the appellants they purchased the right to make a film on the book written by Mr. Fabian Dawson, by paying authorization fee of about 5000 C$. Accordingly, the appellants have made a film named “Dear Jassi”, as based upon the book written by Mr. Fabian Dawson. When the appellants intended to release the said film, the respondent No.1-plaintiff, who claimed to have
The judgment established the importance of an existing work for claiming copyright, the limitations on assignment of copyright, and the conditions for commercial exploitation of privacy rights under ....
The enforceability of personality and publicity rights protects against unauthorized commercial exploitation of a public figure's name, affirming that such names can constitute intellectual property.
The judgment emphasizes the inherent nature of the right to privacy as a common law right and its relationship with the Constitution of India. It highlights the balance between the right to privacy a....
The burden of proving ownership of copyright lies with the plaintiff, and failure to disprove the defendant's contentions can lead to dismissal of the suit.
The Court emphasized that the Plaintiff's gross delay in seeking relief precluded equity, and found no substantial similarity or evidence proving copyright infringement or passing off.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the treatment of the film and the manner of its presentation were quite different from the plaintiff's novel, and there was no substantial sim....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article