Back
HARKESH MANUJA
Harbans Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. investigation details and initial proceedings (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the summoning of petitioners (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis of the witness statements (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. interpretation of section 319 cr.p.c. (Para 8) |
| 5. conclusion on revising the trial court's order (Para 9 , 10) |
Judgment
Mr. Harkesh Manuja, J.
By way of present petition, challenge has been made to an order dated 16.03.2022 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, whereby, an application moved at the instance of prosecution, invoking Section 319 Cr.P.C., for the purpose of summoning of the petitioners has been allowed.
2. Facts leading to the present case are that an FIR No.61 dated 30.04.2017 was registered under Sections 302 /34 IPC and under Section 25 and 27 of the ARMS ACT , at Police Station Sadar Raikot, Ludhiana, at the instance of Gurmeet Kaur i.e. respondent No.2 herein thereby implicating the petitioners besides one Hardeep Singh for alleged murder of her father namely Shingara Singh. During investigation, based on an inquiry report dated 28.07.2017, the petitioners were placed in Column No.2, whereas, challan was presented only against Hardeep Si
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
