SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1723

GURBIR SINGH
Yogendra Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. R.S. Athwal, Mr. R.S. Nain DAG, Haryana, Mr. D.R. Bansal, Mr. Rahul Bansal

Judgment

Mr. Gurbir Singh , J.

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the FIR No.0160 dated 21.03.2018 under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC registered at Police Station Jind City, Haryana.

2. In the case in hand, petitioners were earlier purchasing goods from respondent firm of respondent No.2 and were making the payment.

3. The dispute if any, between the parties is non payment of sum of Rs.2,35,000/- which was part of price of goods.

4. The FIR in question was registered on the basis of written complaint, brief facts as mentioned in the complaint are that the applicants namely Bhichha Ram, Satish Kumar are the Directors of the firm S.J.D. Surgicot Pvt. Ltd. Bhiwani road, Jind and they do the business of manufacturing and selling of absorbent cotton roll I.P. in their firm. The accused-petitioners used to purchase cotton rolls from their aforesaid firm and used to come to Jind for 2-3 times in a month and used to stay there for 4-5 days for purchasing cotton rolls. They kept purchasing cotton rolls from their firm and Rs.3,89,096/- became due towards them. On 17.04.2014 the said accused purchased cotton rolls worth Rs. 2.70 lac more. The accused m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top