Back
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Anita Sachedva – Appellant
Versus
Anita Syal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the background and initial application details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both petitioners and respondents regarding the application for stay. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's reflections on procedural integrity and conduct of the petitioners. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final ruling and dismissal of the petition. (Para 9) |
Judgment
Mr. Vikram Aggarwal, J.
The present revision petition is directed against the order dated 17.07.2023 (Annexure P-9) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana vide which the application filed by the petitioners for staying the operation and execution of the ex parte judgment and decree dated 03.08.2012 (Annexure P-1) during the pendency of the application (Annexure P-5) under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC was dismissed.
2. The facts, as emanating from the revision petition, are that a suit for recovery of ¹ 31,48,700/- (¹ 18,30,639/- as principal amount and Rs. 13,18,061/- as interest @ 24% per annum) was filed by the respondents/DHs against the petitioners-JDs. This suit was decreed ex parte on 03.08.2013. Execution petition was filed. The execution petition was, however, sent to Delhi by the Executing Court at Ludhiana. The petitio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
