SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1599

AMARJOT BHATTI
Amar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Angrej Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Ms. Seemantika Jindal, Mr. Sachin Mittal, Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Ms. Vibha Nagar

Judgment

Ms. Amarjot Bhatti, J.

The appellant/defendant – Amar Singh has filed Regular Second Appeal against impugned judgment and decree dated 18.04.2014 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra vide which the appeal preferred by Amar Singh – appellant/defendant has been dismissed and the judgment and decree dated 03.08.2012 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kurukshetra in favour of Angrej Singh – respondent/plaintiff was upheld.

2. Angrej Singh – respondent/plaintiff had filed suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 09.06.2004 regarding the land measuring 15B-4B, being 2/3rd share, comprised in khewat no. 65/67, khatoni no. 135/139, khasra no. 709(4-0), 719(4-0), 725(4-0), 737(4-0), 738(4-0), 1436/720(2-16), kittas-6 of total area 22B-16B as per jamabandi for the year 1999-2000 situated at Village Jalkheri, Tehsil Thanesar, District Kurukshetra.

3. The plaintiff submitted that the defendant Amar Singh is the owner of aforementioned land. The defendant entered into an agreement to sell dated 09.06.2004 in favour of the plaintiff at the rate of Rs. 2 lacs per acre (that is of 4 Bigha). The defendant had executed/thum

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top