Back
AMARJOT BHATTI
Mukesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Anoop Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. specific performance agreement terms. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendant's objections and claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence. (Para 6 , 7 , 12) |
| 4. trial court's decree summary. (Para 8) |
| 5. arguments from both parties. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. final judgment upholding previous decisions. (Para 11) |
Judgment
Ms. Amarjot Bhatti, J.
The appellant/defendant – Mukesh Kumar has filed regular second appeal against impugned judgment and decree dated 14.02.2023 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Fazilka in civil appeal bearing CIS No.CA-62 of 2022 dated 01.07.2022 dismissing the appeal of the appellant/defendant by upholding the judgment and decree dated 06.04.2022 passed in Civil Suit No.423 of 2020 by the court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Abohar vide which the suit filed by the respondents/plaintiffs was decreed by granting the relief of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 21.03.2017 Ex.PW3/A against the defendant as detailed therein.
2. As per the facts of the case, Anoop Kumar and Vishnu Dutt filed suit for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 21.03.2017 executed by Mukesh Kumar – defendant regarding sale of agricultural lan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
