Back
MANOJ BAJAJ
Neeru – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges eviction under specific act. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's claim of conspiracy in eviction application. (Para 2) |
| 3. respondent counters with senior citizen's application legitimacy. (Para 3) |
| 4. underlying matrimonial dispute affecting eviction context. (Para 4) |
| 5. importance of prior protective orders in eviction proceedings. (Para 5) |
| 6. court's analysis of tribunal's oversight on law and facts. (Para 6) |
| 7. verdict to set aside erroneous eviction order. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Manoj Bajaj, J. (Oral)
This writ petition has been preferred by petitioner under Article 226 Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari to challenge the order dated 21.08.2019 (Annexure P-2), whereby eviction order against her has been passed under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 upon an application moved by respondent No.2.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.2 (senior citizen) brought the application under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 in order to help his son, namely, Rakesh (petitioner's husband) with whom her matrimonial litigation is pending in t
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 to order eviction if necessary and expe....
The Senior Citizens Act empowers senior citizens to seek eviction for their protection, even if there are ongoing civil proceedings regarding property ownership.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
