SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1632

SUDHIR SINGH, SUMEET GOEL
ABC - Husband – Appellant
Versus
XYZ – Wife – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Amandeep S. Rai, Mr. Avtar Singh Sandhu

Judgment

Mr. Sumeet Goel, J.

The challenge in the present appeal is to an order dated 17.10.2023 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Patiala whereby application filed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Act’) for waiving off the statutory period of six months has been rejected.

2. Succinctly facts first, as stated in the pleadings by the parties.

2.1 The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 19.02.2018 according to Sikh rites and ceremonies. They cohabited as husband and wife at village Dharkraba, Tehsil and District Patiala but no issue was born out of this wedlock. However, subsequently the parties started to live separately since January 2020, due to temperamental issues between them. As there were no chances of their reconciliation, the parties on 25.08.2023 filed a petition under Section 13-B of the Act before the Family Court seeking decree of divorce by mutual consent. By an order dated 28.08.2023, the Family Court recorded that the requirement of Section 13B(1) of the Act have been satisfied as the parties have been living separately for a period of more than one year but however with regard to Section 13B(2) of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top