SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2956

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUDHIR SINGH, SUMEET GOEL, JJ.
Hardeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ramandeep Kaur – Respondent
FAO NO. 6628 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 22-12-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Amandeep S. Rai, Advocate for the appellant-husband.
Mr. Avtar Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the respondent-wife.

The cooling-off period under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is directory and can be waived by the court in cases where reconciliation is not possible.

Headnote:(A) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13-B(1) and 13-B(2) - Waiver of statutory period of six months for divorce by mutual consent - Application dismissed by Family Court, stating it does not meet parameters for waiver - Court finds that parties have been living separately since January 2020, no children born, and all reconciliation efforts have failed - Court waives the statutory period as pragmatic given circumstances. (Paras 6, 11, 12)

(B) Legal Principles - Cooling off period under Section 13-B(2) is directory, not mandatory - Courts may waive the period in exceptional circumstances where reconciliation is improbable and parties have settled all issues. (Paras 8, 10)

Facts of the case:
The parties married on 19.02.2018, separated in January 2020, filed for divorce by mutual consent after living apart for over a year, and sought a waiver of the six-month cooling-off period. The Family Court dismissed the waiver application.

Findings of Court:
The court allows the appeal, waives the six-month statutory period, and orders the Family Court to proceed with the divorce petition.

Issues: The main issue was whether the parties were entitled to waive the statutory period under Section 13-B(2).

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the cooling-off period is not mandatory and can be waived if there is no possibility of reconciliation and all efforts for mediation have failed.

Result: Appeal allowed; statutory period waived.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Sumeet Goel, J.

The challenge in the present appeal is to an order dated 17.10.2023 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Patiala whereby application filed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act') for waiving off the statutory period of six months has been rejected.

2. Succinctly facts first, as stated in the pleadings by the parties.

2.1 The marriage between the parties was solemnised on 19.02.2018 according to Sikh rites and ceremonies. They cohabited as husband and wife at village Dharkraba, Tehsil and District Patiala but no issue was born out of this wedlock. However, subsequently the parties started to live separately since January 2020, due to temperamental issues between them. As there were no chances of their reconciliation, the parties on 25.08.2023 filed a petition under Section 13-B of the Act before the Family Court seeking decree of divorce by mutual consent. By an order dated 28.08.2023, the Family Court recorded that the requirement of Section 13B(1) of the Act have been satisfied as the parties have been living separately for a period of more than one year but however with regard to Section 13B(2) of the Act, the parties were required to move a second motion, in accordance with the time frame provided therein. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned to 05.03.2024.

2.2 On 19.09.2023, the parties jointly moved an application before the Family Court seeking waiving off the statutory period of six months under Section 13B(2) of the Act. The Family Court, vide impugned order dated 17.10.2023, dismissed the application in view of the fact that the case of the appellants does not fall within the parameters fixed for waiving off the stipulated period of six months as mentioned under Section 13B(2) of the Act. Aggrieved by this order, the instant appeal has been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant-husband has argued that the learned Family Court has adopted an unreasonable restrictive interpretation while adjudicating upon the application in question. According to him, as a period of 18 months have now admittedly elapsed since the parties started living separately, the application seeking waiver of the period of six months ought to have been allowed.

4. Mr. Avtar Singh Sandhu, Advocate appearing for the respondent-wife submits that he has no objection to the petition being allowed as there is no possibility of subsistence of marriage.

5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the available record with their assistance.

6. The prime point for determination in the present matter is as to whether the parties are entitled to the waiver off the statutory period of six months after presentation of petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Act.

Relevant Statute

7. Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 reads as under:-

    "13B. Divorce by mutual consent.-(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnised before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 (68 of 1976), on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.

    (2) On the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section (1) and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the court shall, on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnised and that the averments in the petition are true, pass a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved with effect from the date of the decre

                                                                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                                    1
                                                                    2
                                                                    3
                                                                    4
                                                                    5
                                                                    6
                                                                    7
                                                                    8
                                                                    9
                                                                    10
                                                                    11
                                                                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                                    supreme today icon
                                                                    logo-black

                                                                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                                    Please visit our Training & Support
                                                                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                                    qr

                                                                    Scan Me!

                                                                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                                    whatsapp-icon Back to top