SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1630

SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Satyaveer Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Vikram Singh, Mr. P.P. Chahar

Judgment

Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J.

CM-20447-CWP-2023

1. This is an application for placing on record the written statement on behalf of respondent No.6.

2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the written statement filed on behalf of respondent No.6 is taken on record as Annexure R-6/1 to R-6/7.

CWP-24505-2023

1. In the instant writ petition a challenge is made to the issuance of the impugned notices, upon, the present petitioners, who are alleged to make unlawful occupations, on the land owned and possessed by the Gram Panchayat concerned.

2. The issuance of the impugned notices, has led to the makings of warrants of possession against the present petitioners, for therebys ensuring that the present petitioners become evicted from the lands owned and possessed by the Gram Panchayat concerned.

3. All the supra led the present petitioners to institute the instant writ petition before this Court. Without going into the merits of the case especially, when the impugned notices, as, issued under Section 24 (1) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1994’) rather become drawn in purely summary proceedings, and also may becom

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top