SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1629

NAMIT KUMAR
Jeeto – Appellant
Versus
Bikkar Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. C.S. Singhal

Judgment

Mr. Namit Kumar, J.

This revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside impugned order dated 27.07.2023 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar, whereby objections filed by the petitioner/judgment-debtor under Section 28 read with Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act in execution application filed by the respondent/decree-holder, have been dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 24.06.2013 regarding land measuring 2 kanals 11 marlas situated within the revenue estate of village Bullowal, Tehsil and District Jalandhar bearing khata No.249/279, comprising khasra No.43//10/1, hadbast No.354 as entered in the jamabandi for the year 2007-2008 consisting of submersible motor and shed etc. and in the alternative for decree of recovery of Rs.10,00,000/- and also for permanent injunction restraining the defendant, her agents, attorneys, associates from further alienating, mortgaging, leasing and exchanging the suit property or changing the nature of the suit property except i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top