SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1371

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Ritu Tagore, J.
Parveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRA-S No. 1424-SB of 2016
Decided On : 08-12-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Naveen Gupta, Mr. H.S. Sullar Sr. DAG, Punjab

Strict compliance with procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act is essential for upholding the integrity of evidence in drug-related offenses.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 22(c), 50, 52-A - Conviction for possession of contraband - Conviction set aside due to non-compliance with mandatory provisions of Section 52-A regarding the drawing of samples before a Magistrate, leading to doubts about the integrity of the evidence. (Paras 20, 24, 28, 42)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 313 - The appellant denied allegations and claimed false implication but did not present evidence in defense. (Paras 9, 11)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted for possessing 120 grams of Alprazolam after allegedly discarding it upon seeing police. The prosecution relied on witness testimonies and evidence regarding the recovery process. (Paras 2-6)

Findings of Court:
The trial court's conviction was found erroneous due to procedural lapses in evidence collection and sample handling. (Paras 42-44)

Issues: Whether the prosecution complied with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act during the recovery and sampling process? (Paras 24, 30)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity for strict adherence to statutory procedures in drug-related cases to ensure justice and uphold individual rights. (Paras 20, 28, 41)

Result: Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside. (Paras 44, 45)

Judgment

Mrs. Ritu Tagore, J.

This appeal is directed against judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 04.03.2016/10.03.2016 passed by Judge, Special Court, Pathankot, convicting the appellant-accused under Section 22 (c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the NDPS Act’) and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten (10) years and to pay fine Rs.1,00,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.

2. Facts of prosecution are that on 01.01.2015, police party headed by Surjit Raj, ASI (PW-5), apprehended accused-appellant, in the area of Gowshalla Turning Point, Pathankot, suspecting his conduct, as on seeing police party, he took out one plastic packet (lifafa) from pocket of his pant and threw it on the ground.

3. On checking the polythene packet (lifafa), some intoxicant powder was recovered. Two samples each weighing 10 grams were separated and converted into two parcels. Remaining contraband was weighed and found to be 100 grams, which was put into the third parcel. All the parcels were sealed by ASI Surjit Raj with his seal bearing impression ‘SR’. Sample (Ex.P-1) of his seal was also prepared by him on Form M-29 (Ex.PX) and, thereafter, he handed over his seal to PHC Pawan Kumar (PW-2). Seizure memo (Ex.PW-2/A) was prepared.

4. Ruqa (Ex.PW-5/A) was sent to the Police Station, on the basis of which, FIR (Ex.PW-5/B as mentioned in the judgment) under Sections 21/22 of the Act was registered. Arrest-cum-intimation memo (Ex.PW-2/B), personal search memo (Ex.PW-2/C) and site plan (Ex.PW-5/C) were prepared at the spot.

5. Thereafter, the accused along with the case property was produced before SHO Sukhjinder Singh (PW-1), who affixed his seal bearing impression ‘SS’ on the case property and prepared sample (Ex.P-2) of his seal on CFSL Form (Ex.PX). He also prepared handing over case property memo (Ex.PW-1/A).

6. On the next day, ASI Surjit Raj, (PW-5) produced case property before the Magistrate by submitting inventory report (Ex.PW-1/B) and application (Ex.PW-1/C), who passed authentication order (Ex.PW-5/D). Thereafter, the case property was deposited with SHO Sukhjinder Singh. Sample parcels along with sample seal were sent for chemical examination. Report (Ex.PZ) was sent by Chemical Examiner, which reflected Alprazolam, a psychotropic substance in the recovered contraband. After completion of usual formalities of investigation, Challan was presented in trial Court against the accused-appellant.

7. After making due compliance of provisions of Section 207 Cr.P.C., charge under Section 22 (c) of the Act was framed against the accused, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.

8. To prove the charge against the appellant-accused, prosecution examined ASI Surjit Raj (PW-5), the investigating officer, HC Pawan Kumar (PW-2), recovery witness. Both of them described the entire incident leading to recovery of 120 grams of contraband from the possession of the appellant-accused. SHO Sukhjinder Singh (PW-1) deposed about presenting the case property and appellant-accused before him for verification and authentication of the recovery proceedings and sealing of case property with his seal bearing impressions ‘SS’, and, thereafter deposit of case property in Malkhana and sending the sample parcels along with sample seal to the office of chemical examiner for analysis . HC Pawan Kumar (PW-2) further deposed that he deposited the sample parcel in the office of Chemical Examiner in intact condition. PHC Balwinder Kumar (PW-3) deposed that he handed over the special reports of this case to the Magistrate and higher police officers. PHC Gurdip Singh (PW-4) deposed that on 06.01.2015, he could not deposit sample parcel in the office of the Chemical Examiner due to leave of the concerned Clerk and re-deposited the sample parcel with SHO Sukhjinder Singh (PW-1) on same day.

9. In statement under Section 313 Cr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top