IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Kuldeep Tiwari, J.
Malkit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M No. 40317 of 2023
Decided On : 23-07-2024
Bail - Regular Bail - IPC Sections 364-A, 370, 386, 120-B - The court emphasized the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, considering the period of incarceration, completion of investigation, and the absence of charges framed against the petitioners.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought regular bail in a case involving allegations of kidnapping and extortion under a common FIR. They were accused of running a syndicate that duped individuals under the pretext of sending them abroad, leading to ransom demands from their families.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners had been incarcerated for over a year without charges being framed, and that significant recoveries had been made by the investigating agency. The court concluded that continued detention served no purpose.
Issues: Whether the petitioners should be granted regular bail considering their period of incarceration, the status of the trial, and the nature of the allegations against them.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that bail is generally granted unless there are compelling reasons to deny it, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the right to a speedy trial.
Result: The petitions for regular bail were allowed subject to conditions.
JUDGMENT :
Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, J.
The amenability of all these petitions for being decided through a common verdict originates from them being arising out of a common FIR, besides common relief(s) being yearned therein.
2. To be precise, in all these petitions, the petitioners seek the relief of them being enlarged on regular bail, in FIR No.03 dated 03.01.2023, under Sections 364-A, 370, 386, 120-B of the IPC, registered at P.S. Balongi, District S.A.S. Nagar
GIST OF THE FIR
3. The genesis of the present FIR is embodied in a statement made by one Sukhwinder Singh son of Amarjit Singh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘complainant’). Succinctly stated, the allegations against the petitioners and their co-accused are that, they have duped many gullible people on the pretext of sending them abroad and held them hostages in order to extort money from them. For ready reference, the relevant extract of complainant’s statement is extracted hereunder:-
DETAILS OF INVESTIGATION
4. Upon notice(s) becoming issued on these petitions, the respondent-State filed separate status reports/replies, detailing therein the incriminatory material(s) collected by the investigating agency against the petitioners, besides detailing therein the role of petitioners and the manner in which the offence has been committed.
5. The record available before this Court reveals that, it surfaced during investigation that the accused were/are running a crime syndicate, inasmuch as, they allured aspiring innocent people to send them abroad, however, instead of sending them to actual abroad destinations, they used to send them to Indonesia, where one Sunny Kumar (brother of accused Sahil) and his allies used to kidnap them and extort huge sums of money from their parents. The illegally detained people were released only after receipt of ransom from their families.
6. In the present case, statements of two victims have been recorded, wherein, they have corroborated the allegations (supra). Moreover, a thorough investigation was conducted, which resulted in total 10 persons becoming arrayed as accused in the present FIR. Out of these 10 accused, 07 accused have been arrested, whereas, 03 accused are absconding.
7. What further emanates from the record is that, during investigation, gold articles weighing 2
Gurcharan Singh v. State (Delhi Admn.) (1978) 1 SCC 118
The court established that prolonged incarceration without trial is unjust, reinforcing the principle that bail is the norm in criminal proceedings.
The principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception was upheld, emphasizing the need for judicial discretion based on the specifics of each case.
The court established that bail is the default option in criminal law, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the right to a speedy trial, prior to evaluating eyewitness testimony.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.