IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Kuldeep Tiwari, J.
Baldish Kaur – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M No. 33786 of 2023
Decided On : 23-07-2024
Bail - Regular Bail - IPC Sections 406, 420, 370, 386, 364-A, 120-B; Punjab Travel Professionals (Regulation) Act, 2014 - The court discussed the principles of bail, emphasizing that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, considering the period of incarceration, recovery of the cheated amount, and the stage of trial.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought regular bail in a case involving allegations of cheating and human trafficking, where they allegedly defrauded individuals under the pretext of sending them abroad, resulting in significant financial loss to the complainant.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners had already suffered substantial incarceration, the entire cheated amount had been recovered, and the trial was unlikely to conclude soon, thus justifying the grant of bail.
Issues: Whether the petitioners should be granted regular bail considering the nature of the allegations, the period of incarceration, and the recovery of the cheated amount.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach considering the rights of the accused and the interests of justice.
Result: The petitions for regular bail are allowed subject to conditions.
JUDGMENT :
Kuldeep Tiwari, J.
The amenability of all these petitions for being decided through a common verdict originates from them being arising out of a common FIR, besides common relief(s) being yearned therein.
2. To be precise, in all these petitions, the petitioners seek the relief of them being enlarged on regular bail, in FIR No.08 dated 06.01.2023, under Sections 406/420/370/386/364-A/120-B of the IPC, and, Section 13 of the Punjab Travel Professionals (Regulation) Act, 2014, registered at P.S. Sadar Kharar, District S.A.S. Nagar.
GIST OF THE FIR
3. The genesis of the present FIR is embodied in a complaint made by one Gurpreet Singh son of Manjit Singh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘complainant’). Notably, the complainant has now been transposed as an accused by order of the learned trial Court concerned.
4. Succinctly stated, the allegations levelled in the complaint (supra) are that, the petitioners and their co-accused cheated innocent persons to the tune of crores of rupees, on the pretext of sending them abroad. For ready reference, the relevant extract of the complaint (supra), as reproduced in the present FIR, is extracted hereunder:-
“...Subject: complaint against Baldish alias Disho, his son Raman, Karan and Gurpreet Singh, present office 404, Bajwa, Sunny Enclave, Sector-125, Kharar, District SAS. Nagar (Mohali), Me No: 8283844477, 9877066228 and Sahib Mobile No: +1 (330) 587- 5151 Karan, +17058090749 Jasbir, Hukum Singh Aartia, Munish Samli for defrauding the relatives of the applicant in the name of sending them abroad and committed a fraud of about 2 crores with the applicant. Kindly investigate the matter from Gazetted Rank officer. Sir, It is humbly requested that the office of above said persons is at Sunny Enclave, who approached me and offered me to work with them. I was assured by them that we have already sent many people to Canada, UK through the shipping company. etc. to the countries and we also take the amount after the visa is issued and when the person reaches there. Trusting their words, I sent my relatives Jobanpal Singh (UK). Malkit Singh (Canada) Samsher Singh, Sukhpreet Singh, Davinder, Parminder, Gurwinder (Mexico) and gave passports to send them and Rs 18 lakh from Jobanpal and Rs 28 lakh from Malkit Singh Samsher Singh, Sukhpreet, Davinder, Parminder Gurwinder Rs 30 lakh were given per person. That the above accused told me on date 03/05/2022 that we sent the photograph of the said Jobanpal that the immigration of Jobanpal has been cleared and he will reach the UK by Air India flight at 12.30 the next day and the made a call to us through the internet from UK that Jobanpal has arrived safely and also showed the fake boarding pass and said that you should give me the fixed amount of 18 lakh rupees. On trusting them, I gave Rs.18 Lakh to the above said accused persons in my ofice, the proof of which I have. That after this, just like before, the above accused made Malkit Singh’s flight to Canada by getting a fake boarding pass and fake stepping and sent us a photo and sent us a fake location of Canada and told us that Malkit Singh reached Canada and I gave Rupees 28 lakh cash to the above accused at More Showroom, Opposite Nijjar Chowk, Sunny Enclave, Kharar on 13/05/2022 time 8:15 pm on Sunday and it is also mentioned here that they threatened Malkit Singh and called his relatives at the gun point that Malkit Singh had reached safely and asked his relatives to contact me, on which his relatives contacted me and told me that you have sent Malkit Singh abroad, now sent us also. That after this the above accused first sent Samsher Singh, Sukhpreet Singh, Davinder, Parminder, Gurvinder (Mexico) them to Indonesia and called me and said we have sent them from Indonesia to Mexico through a shipping company. They have reached there and sent me with a fake location and entry stamp and I gave the above accused persons Rs.30 lakhs per person, Samsher Singh’s Rs.30,00,000/- in cash Moran Showroom, Fro
Gudikanti Narasimhulu and others Versus Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Gurcharan Singh v. State (Delhi Admn.) (1978) 1 SCC 118
AI
The principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception was upheld, emphasizing the need for judicial discretion based on the specifics of each case.
The court established that prolonged incarceration without trial is unjust, reinforcing the principle that bail is the norm in criminal proceedings.
The court established that involvement in serious fraudulent activities, supported by substantial evidence, is a valid ground for denying bail.
The court balanced the right to personal liberty with the need for the accused's presence at trial, emphasizing that continued custody should be based on the risk of interference in the administratio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.