Amardeep vs State Of Haryana - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 1633

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1633

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
KULDEEP TIWARI
Amardeep – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Keshavam Chaudhri, Advocate with Mr. Sajal Bansal, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Bhupender Singh, D.A.G., Haryana

JUDGMENT :

Kuldeep Tiwari, J.

Through this second petition cast under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner craves for him being enlarged on regular bail, in case FIR No.67 dated 03.02.2022, under Section 302 of the IPC (Sections 34, 201 of the IPC added subsequently), registered at P.S. Pinjore, District Panchkula.

2. Petitioner's initial bail petition bearing No.CRM-M-14890-2023 was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court, vide order dated 18.07.2023. However, on account of there being no progress in the trial since the drawing of the order dated 18.07.2023, petitioner has again approached this Court for claiming the relief of regular bail.

GIST OF THE FIR AND INVESTIGATION

3. The genesis of the present FIR is embodied in the statement made by one Ashok Kumar (hereinafter referred to as the 'complainant'). The death of the complainant's son Abhinav Chandel (hereinafter referred to as the 'deceased') has constituted the bedrock for registration of the present FIR. The relevant extract of the complainant's statement, as narrated in the reply dated 01.03.2024, is reproduced hereunder:-

"3...present case was registered on the statement of Ashok Kumar son of Khyali Ram, wherein he alleged