Back
SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Yash Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sureshwar Thakur, J.
1. Since a common question of law involves in both the petitions (supra) as well as in the LPA (supra), hence both the petitions (supra) as well as the LPA (supra) are amenable for a common verdict being made thereon.
2. In CRWP-4660-2021, the petitioners have sought a direction being passed upon the respondents concerned to protect their life and liberty, from the respondents concerned. In the petition (supra), though petitioner No. 1 is already married, however he has been living with petitioner No. 2 in a live-in relationship and they want to perform marriage, but after obtaining a decree of divorce by petitioner No. 1, from his wife.
3. CRWP-149-2024, has been filed by the petitioners seeking a direction being passed upon the respondents concerned to protect their life and liberty from the respondents concerned. In the petition (supra), though petitioner No. 1 is already married, however she has been living with petitioner No. 2 in a live-in relationship.
4. LPA No. 968 of 2021 has been filed by the appellants seeking for the quashing the impugned order dated 31.8.2021 passed by this Court in CRWP No. 8208 of 2021, whereby the petition (supra) filed b
The court recognized the right to choose intimate partners, emphasizing that protection of personal liberties in live-in relationships is a fundamental right under Article 21, regardless of marital s....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's duty to ensure the protection and welfare of minors in accordance with the statutory framework under the Juvenile Justice Act, while al....
The fundamental right to seek protection of life and liberty extends to minors, and the court has a duty to ensure their welfare and safety.
The paramount consideration of the welfare of the minor and the applicability of the statutory framework provided by the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2015 and the Protection....
Live-in relationships are legally recognized, and individuals have the right to choose partners, protected under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution.
Proper representation of minors and evidence of threat are essential in petitions seeking protection for live-in-relationships involving minors. Additionally, the court highlighted the issue of child....
The right to live together in an interfaith relationship is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution, guarding personal liberty against familial and societal coercion.
Live-in-relationships are recognized as part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21, but lack specific legal recognition, necessitating legislative action for protection.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
