SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1940

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Estate officer, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran Rewari – Appellant
Versus
Rahul – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Arvind Seth.

Table of Content
1. nature of the petitioner's request under article 227. (Para 1)
2. importance of granting the petitioner the chance to defend. (Para 2)
3. trial court's previous actions regarding the written statement. (Para 3)
4. balancing procedural law with substantial justice. (Para 4)
5. court's directive to allow filing of the written statement. (Para 5)
6. conditions for granting the opportunity to the petitioner. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT :

Rajbir Sehrawat, J.

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying for setting aside the impugned order dated 14.11.2022 (Annexure P1) passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kosli, District Rewari in CIS No.CS/85/2022, whereby the defence on behalf of the petitioners/defendants No.3 and 4 is struck off.

2. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a public body involved in protection of the public properties. The petitioner is the contesting defendant in the civil suit. On some dates, the written statement could not be filed by the petitioner because of unavoidable circumstances. As a result, the trial Court has struck off the right of the petitioner to file the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top