SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1948

SANJAY VASHISTH
Canara Bank through its GPA – Appellant
Versus
Bhupinder Hosiery VPO Darbi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rahish Pahwa, Advocate and Mr. Annie Surya, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY VASHISTH , J.

1. Present revision petition has been directed by the petitioner against the order dated 04.10.2023 (P-1), passed by Ld. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sirsa, whereby, evidence of the petitioner (plaintiff therein), has been closed on account of the fact that despite availing several effective opportunities, petitioner failed to conclude his evidence.

2. Briefly, facts of the case are that plaintiff (petitioner herein) filed a suit for Recovery of Rs. 11,19,843/- against the defendants (respondents herein) in which, notice was issued for 20.05.2020 to defendants. After completion of pleadings, issues were framed on 10.08.2021 by Learned Trial Court and the case was fixed for plaintiff’s evidence for 08.11.2021.

3. For the sake of convenience and brevity, the proceedings conducted before the Learned Trial Court on various dates is represented below chronologically:

4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that if one opportunity is granted, subject to the payment of some costs, he undertakes to complete his evidence by producing the witnesses. Counsel for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top