SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2450

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Sant Ram – Appellant
Versus
Mangal Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
None; For the Appellant
Mr. Sachin Jain, Advocate for the respondent No.1.

JUDGMENT

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

The Regular Second Appeal in the States of Punjab, Haryana and Union Territory, Chandigarh is governed by Section 41 of the PUNJAB COURTS ACT , 1918 and not by Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as held by a five Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Pankajakshi (Dead) through LRs v. Chandrika and Others (2016) 6 SCC 157.

2. While filing the second appeal, the plaintiff assails the correctness of the judgments and decrees passed on 06.11.2013 and 25.08.2015 by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), S.B.S.Nagar, and the Additional District Judge, S.B.S.Nagar, respectively.

3. The relevant facts, in brief, are that the plaintiff-Sh.Sant Ram filed a suit for grant of decree of declaration, to the effect that he is the owner in possession of the land/property measuring 0 kanals and 7 marlas being 7/10th share in the plot measuring 0 Kanals and 10 marlas comprised in khasra No. 235 (0-7) and 244 (0-3) situated in the residential area of the village Sarhal Quazian, Tehsil Nawanshahr, District Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar and the entries in the jamabandi for the year 1981-82 regarding the share of the plaintiff and the jamabandies for the subsequent year

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top