ANOOP CHITKARA
Kuldeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Anoop Chitkara, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 1 | 10.02.2017 | Vigilance Bureau, Economic Offences Wing, District Ludhiana | 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC and 13(1) (D) read with 13(2) of the PC Act (Sec"on 201 IPC added later on) |
The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.
2. In paragraph 19 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.
3. petitioner's counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions and are also voluntarily agreeable to the condition that till the conclusion of the trial, the petitioner shall keep only one mobile number, which is mentioned in AADHAR card, if any, and within fifteen days undertakes to disconnect all other mobile numbers. The petitioner contends that custodial interrogation and pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.
4. The state's counsel opposes the bail. Reply dated 07.03.2024 filed by State counsel today in the Court is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to counsel for the petitioner.
5. T
Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Gudikanti Narasimhulu v. Public Prosecutor
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav
Prahlad Singh Bhati v. NCT, Delhi
State of Rajasthan v. Balchand
Sumit Mehta v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
Sushila Aggarwal v. State(NCT of Delhi) 2020:INSC:106 : (2020) 5 SCC 1.
Anticipatory bail may be granted when the accused's involvement is minimal and custodial interrogation is not justified, provided stringent conditions are imposed to ensure compliance and prevent int....
Anticipatory bail can be granted even after prior custody if custodial interrogation is not justified, balancing individual rights with the necessity of a fair trial.
The court established that bail should be granted unless there are compelling reasons to deny it, emphasizing the need for a fair trial and the protection of the accused's rights.
The court emphasized that bail conditions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act must balance the liberty of the accused with the necessity of a fair trial, allowing bail given the minor financ....
Anticipatory bail can be granted if the accused is a first offender and there is no prima facie evidence of wrongdoing, subject to stringent conditions to ensure compliance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.