ANOOP CHITKARA
Bharat Bhushan Ashu – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations related to bribe and tender manipulation. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments for bail. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. criteria for granting bail in serious offences. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. conditions for bail to mitigate risks. (Para 9 , 10 , 13) |
| 5. bail procedures and options for the petitioner. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. bail conditions must balance rights and fair trial. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. rights of the petitioner regarding bail conditions. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. investigation rights remain unaffected by bail. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 9. court's conclusion and order on bail. (Para 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 18 | 22.9.2022 | Vigilance Bureau, District Jalandhar. | 7, 7A, 8, 12, 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC |
This order shall dispose of two petitions i.e. CRM-M-321 -2023 and CRM-M-7421- 2023, as the same have arisen out of common FIR and the same involve similar issue. However, for brevity, facts have been noticed from CRM-M-321-2023.
2. Petitioner, incarcerating in the FIR captioned above, on the allegations of receiving bribe through his conduits for
Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Gudikanti Narasimhulu v. Public Prosecutor
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav
Prahlad Singh Bhati v. NCT, Delhi
Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The court held that prosecution initiated for policy amendments is an abuse of process, as no cognizable offense was established against the petitioners.
Anticipatory bail may be granted in non-bailable offences if the accused is a first offender and the evidence is primarily documentary, provided they comply with conditions set by the court.
The court emphasized that bail should be granted unless justified by circumstances indicating a risk of fleeing or tampering with evidence, balancing the accused's liberty with the integrity of the t....
The court ruled that anticipatory bail was justified due to insufficient grounds for custodial interrogation, highlighting the need for careful consideration of allegations and evidence in corruption....
The public interest in a time-bound nutrition program may outweigh the private commercial interest of a petitioner benefiting from the relaxation of tender conditions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.