Gurbhej Singh vs U. T. Chandigarh - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 684

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(P&H) 684

ANOOP CHITKARA
Gurbhej Singh – Appellant
Versus
U. T. Chandigarh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sukhdev Singh Bhinder, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Manish Bansal, P.P., U.T., Chandigarh With Mr. Shubham Mangla, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.	Dated	Police Station	Sections
63	11.04.2024	Central Sector-17, Chandigarh	406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and 13(1) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.

2. In paragraph 13 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.

3. The prosecution's case is being taken from reply dated 04.07.2024 filed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, E.O.W, Sector-17, Chandigarh, which reads as follows:

"3. That the brief facts of the case are that, FIR No.63 Dated 11.04.2024 Under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC and Section 13(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1900 at P.S. Central Sector, Chandigarh (Annexure P-l) has registered against M/S Star Enterprises, M/S Virk Computer Hub, M/s GuruKirpa Enterprises, M/S Guru Nanak Enterprises, Bhim Singh Clerk, the then caretaker, Ms. Kiranjit Kaur Walia, Supdt, the then DDO and Sh. N.K. Mittal the then DD Admn and others. The instant prosecution has been launched at the instance of District Food a