SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2755

ARUN MONGA
Bhagwan Dass Jindal – Appellant
Versus
Shree Sanatan Dharam Sabha (Regd. ) Bathinda – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Harpinder Singh Jalal, Advocate for revisionist.

Table of Content
1. tenant's evidence closure (Para 1 , 2)
2. no prejudice for landlords (Para 3 , 4)
3. justice and delay in proceedings (Para 5)
4. rights of litigants (Para 6)
5. opportunity to lead evidence granted (Para 7)
6. judgment conclusion (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

Arun Monga, J. (Oral)

Present revision petition is to set aside impugned order dated 14.03.2023 passed by learned Rent Controller, Bathinda, whereby, evidence of revisionist/tenant, was closed by Court order.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend that respondent/ landlords filed an eviction petition against revisionist/tenant qua Shop No.20 MR situated at the Mall Road, Opposite Gole Diggi Market, Bathinda on the ground of non-payment of House Tax and Service Tax that accrued against said shop in question. Respondent/landlords took four years with unlimited opportunities and as such closed evidence in affirmative on 06.03.2020. Thereafter, case was adjourned to 20.03.2020 for evidence of revisionist/tenant. Revisionist moved an application for production of documents on 12.09.2022. No reply was filed and on 12.01.2023, learned counsel for landlords made a statement that he does not want to file reply and case wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top