Back
DEEPAK SIBAL, DEEPAK MANCHANDA
Groz-Beckert Asia Pvt. Limited – Appellant
Versus
Upinder Kumar Singla – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Deepak Sibal, J.
The present intra-Court appeal arises from the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 14.02.2024 through which respondent No.1's writ petition, filed by him to challenge therein order dated 25.09.2017, passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner-cum-Conciliation Officer, UT, Chandigarh (for short-the Conciliation Officer) has been allowed.
2. The facts, in brief, which are required to be noticed for adjudicating upon the instant appeal are that through appointment letter dated 31.01.1985, respondent No.1 was appointed by the appellant company in its head office at Chandigarh as a Trainee (General Clerk) and on 31.01.1988 his services were confirmed as Personal/Time Office Assistant. On 31.07.1996 but w.e.f. 01.07.1996 respondent No.1 was promoted to the post of Assistant Officer (Personnel). In the year 2000 he earned another promotion to the post of Personnel Officer and in the year 2005 as Executive (Personnel and IR). In the year 2011 respondent No.1 was further promoted as Assistant Manager (Personnel & IR).
3. In the year 2015 respondent No.1 was transferred from the head office of the appellant at Chandigarh to its Tamil Nadu offic
The Labour Court at Chandigarh has jurisdiction to adjudicate the termination claim as the decision to terminate was made at the head office in Chandigarh, establishing part of the cause of action th....
The situs of employment is an important factor which determines the jurisdiction. The cause of action is to be determined by applying the principle as enumerated in Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Labour Court in the area where the workman was employed and where the cause of action arose would have territorial jurisdiction, as suppor....
The Labour Court at Chandigarh has jurisdiction over the dispute as the decision to terminate the workman was made at the head office located there, despite the workman being posted in Tirupur.
Labour/Industrial Courts in Maharashtra have jurisdiction to hear complaints of unfair labour practice if relevant decisions are made within Maharashtra, despite employee postings outside the State.
Whenever any proceedings are filed before any Authority or Court and if one of party were to raise an objection as regards pecuniary jurisdiction or territorial jurisdiction, said Court could decide ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
