Back
SANJAY VASHISTH
Upinder Kumar Singla – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Labour Commissioner-Cum-Conciliation Officer, U. T. , Chandigarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, J.
Petitioner-Upinder Kumar Singla, has filed the present writ petition for setting aside the impugned order dated 25.09.2017(Annexure P-1), passed by the respondent No. 1- Assistant Labour Commissioner-cum-Conciliation officer, U.T. Chandigarh, whereby, the demand notice served by the petitioner has been rejected after suo moto reviewing the earlier order dated 15.09.2017 (Annexure P-5).
2. Facts detailed in the demand notice are that workman-Upinder Kumar Singla joined his services with respondent No.2-M/s Groz-Beckert Asia Pvt, Limited, 133-135, Industrial Area-I, Chandigarh on 01.02.1986 at the age of 19+ as a Trainee (General Clerk) vide appointment letter dated 31.01.1986. The appointment letter was issued under the signature of Vice President (Tech.) as appointing authority. The service of the workman was confirmed vide letter dated 31.01.1988 as Personnel/Time Office Assistant. The said confirmation letter was also issued by Vice President (Tech) as appointing authority.
The workman was assigned the duties of a clerk to do manual working such as marking the attendance in attendance register, maintaining the leave records, making of shift notice,
The Labour Court at Chandigarh has jurisdiction over the dispute as the decision to terminate the workman was made at the head office located there, despite the workman being posted in Tirupur.
The situs of employment is an important factor which determines the jurisdiction. The cause of action is to be determined by applying the principle as enumerated in Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The....
Labour/Industrial Courts in Maharashtra have jurisdiction to hear complaints of unfair labour practice if relevant decisions are made within Maharashtra, despite employee postings outside the State.
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT IS THE APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT IN RELATION TO AN INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CONCERNING A CONTRACT LABOURER EMPLOYED AT THE OFFICE OF IBP/IOC SITUATED AT IBP HOUSE, 34A, NIRMAL CHANDRA S....
The Labour Court at Chandigarh has jurisdiction to adjudicate the termination claim as the decision to terminate was made at the head office in Chandigarh, establishing part of the cause of action th....
Point of Law- Law does not prescribe any time-limit for the appropriate Government to exercise its powers under Section 10 of the Act. It is not that this power can be exercised at any point of time ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
