Back
G. S. SANDHAWALIA, HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
Gurjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Industrial Tribunal, Patiala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. condonation of delay in appeal (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. claim for reinstatement and compensation (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. court's affirmation of tribunal and single judge's finding (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. recognition of compensation standards by courts (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. dismissal of appeal (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT
Harpreet Kaur Jeewan, J. - CMs-711-712-LPA-2018
By these applications, the applicant-appellant seeks condonation of delay of 220 days in re-filing and 299 days in filing the appeal.
In view of the averments made in the applications, which are duly supported by affidavits of the applicant-appellant, sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay.
Consequently, the applications are allowed and the delay of 220 days in re-filing and 299 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.
LPA-285-2018 (O&M)
Consideration in the present Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellant (hereinafter referred to as the 'workman') is to the order of the learned Single Judge in CWP-24987-2012, titled Gurjit Singh v. Industrial Tribunal, Patiala and another whereby the learned Single Judge has only modified the Award dated 03.04.2012 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Patiala (here
Daily wage worker - Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen - Quantum of compensation - Termination of service of employee by way of retrenchment without complying with requirement of giving ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
