Back
G. S. SANDHAWALIA, HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
Sukhbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. condonation of delay in appeal process. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding acceptance of similar awards deemed illegal. (Para 3) |
| 3. details of workman's employment history and termination. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. justification for awarding compensation instead of reinstatement. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 5. order for compensation payment and implications. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT
Mr. G.S. Sandhawalia, J. - CM-266-LPA-2022
Application for condoning the delay of 1311 days in re-filing the appeal is allowed, in view of the averments made in the application, duly supported by affidavit. Delay of 1311 days in re-filing the appeal is hereby condoned.
CM stands disposed of.
LPA-1203-2021 (O&M)
Consideration in the present appeal is to the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 09.11.2017 passed in CWP-16769-2002 titled State of Haryana v. Sukhbir Singh & another wherein the writ petition filed by the State was allowed and the Labour Court award dated 25.02.2002 (Annexure P-6) which was in favour of the workman to the extent that reinstatement had been directed with continuity of service and full back wages from the date of the demand notice was set aside.
2. The learned Single Judge was of the vie
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
