SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 853

G. S. SANDHAWALIA, LAPITA BANERJI
Bagri Steels – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Arvind Galav, Advocate; For the Petitioner
For the Respondent: Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

JUDGMENT

G.S.Sandhawalia, J. (Oral)

Challenge in the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 05.01.2024 (Annexure P-8) passed by respondent No.2 wherein penalty and fine has been imposed under Sections 130(1) and 130(2) of the Central/Punjab Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (in short 'the Act') for the goods which were being carried in vehicle No. HR-56A-8899 which had been intercepted on 15.12.2022.

2. Keeping in view the fact that there is a remedy of appeal which is provided under Section 107 of the Act on a nominal payment of 10% of the amount imposed, we are of the considered opinion that the petitioner has an alternate and efficacious remedy available.

3. Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to approach the Appellate Authority by filing a statutory appeal. Keeping in view the law laid down by the Apex Court in The State of Punjab v. M/s. Shiv Enterprises and others, 2023 (96) GST 120, we are of the considered opinion that it is not for this Court to go into the disputed questions which are now sought to be raised as to whether the vehicle had stopped at Khanna to unload th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top