Ms. Shilpa Sharma vs Haryana Human Rights Commission

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2343

JAISHREE THAKUR
Ms. Shilpa Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Haryana Human Rights Commission – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Puneet Bali, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Uday Agnihotri, Advocate, for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Jaishree Thakur, J.

The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing order dated 04.07.2017, Annexure P-7, vide which the services of the petitioner as Senior Scale Stenographer were declared as contractual w.e.f. 04.07.2017 till 30.08.2017 despite the fact that she has been appointed on regular basis against the said post. Petitioner also seeks quashing of order dated 25.07.2017, Annexure P-9, whereby respondents have dispensed with her services w.e.f. 27.07.2017.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as officiating Senior Scale Stenographer in the regular pay scale of Rs.9300-34800 plus Rs.3200 Grade Pay and DA with the Haryana Human Rights Commission vide order dated 22.06.2015. She submitted her joining report on 06.07.2015 and successfully completed her one year probation period. The petitioner was served with communication dated 23.12.2016 vide which the appointment/probation period of the petitioner was extended for one month after a gap of four months of completion of the probation period. Thereafter, the respondents issued letter dat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document