SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 716

VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
RAHUL S/o AMOLAKCHAND JAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


ORDER : – In the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 5-3-2020, by which the contractual services of the petitioner have been put to an end on account of violation of clause 11.2 of the Human Resources Manual (in short H. R. Manual). The said order is challenged mainly on the ground that the action of the respondent No. 2 is in violation of the fundamental rights of the petitioner guaranteed under Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

2. The facts of the case is that the petitioner was initially appointed on 24-12-2005. In the year 2014, the petitioner was assigned the work of District Community Mobilizer at Khargone. The petitioner was caught red-handed in the office premises. The Lokayukt Department has issued a letter to the respondent to transfer the petitioner to some other place. Thereafter, the petitioner was transferred to Umaria by the respondents. Subsequently, the petitioner was served with a show cause notice. The petitioner had given reply to the said show cause notice. By the impugned order dated 5-3-2018, the services of the petitioner has been terminated in view of clause 11.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top