SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3344

LISA GILL, RITU TAGORE
Sandeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Deepika – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate; For the Appellant
Mr. Varun Veer Chauhan, Advocate; For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Lisa Gill, J.

This appeal has been filed by the appellant - husband challenging judgment and decree dated 20.10.2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Jalandhar.

2. Brief facts of the case are that petition under section 13B of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 (for short - 'the Act') seeking dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce with mutual consent was filed by the parties before the learned Family Court, Jalandhar. Marriage between the parties was solemnized on 24.09.2012. No child was born out of this wedlock. Relation between the parties became strained and despite earnest efforts by relatives and friends as well, they could not re-concile their difference. Parties, it is stated, were residing separately from each other since 27.12.2013. Petition under Section 13B of the Act was filed on 08.01.2018. Respondent - wife agreed to accept a sum of Rs.3,25,000/- towards all her claims - past, present, future and permanent alimony qua the husband. A sum of Rs.1,50,000/-was received by the wife on 09.01.2018. Her statement at first motion was recorded on 09.01.2018 (Annexure A1). Statement of the husband was also recorded on 09.01.2018 regarding the settleme

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top